Published blog posts

Latest writing

The Realz blog examines how manipulated images, deepfakes, and visual impersonation affect verification, confidence, and trust in digital evidence and communications.

When fake images hit public trust: what this small set of incidents shows

In this sample of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, the geography is limited and the timeframe is short: eight reported cases across India, Italy, and Saudi Arabia, all clustered around 5-6 May 2026. That makes this a narrow editorial snapshot, not a comprehensive survey. Still, even in a small set like this, a few useful patterns stand out.

Thesis: In this small set of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, AI-generated and manipulated images were used in two distinct ways: to attach false claims to real-world events, and to target a public figure with non-consensual synthetic imagery. The common thread is not just image fakery itself, but the pressure it puts on public trust, verification, and the quality of decisions people make before they share or react.

Read article →

When a Fake Image Becomes a Real Incident

In the incidents we've looked at here at Realz, the most important pattern is not simply that fake images are circulating. It is that they are being treated as evidence, signals, or proof at the exact moment people are under pressure to react.

Thesis: In this small set of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, AI-generated and manipulated images were not just misleading visuals. They triggered public alarm, damaged reputations, disrupted political and civic processes, and in some cases supported apparent fraud. The clearest lesson is not that every fake image is technically sophisticated, but that visual authenticity now affects decision quality, trust, and response workflows across public life.

Read article →

When a Picture Isn’t Just a Picture: What Four April Incidents Say About Visual Trust

Over a single week in April, a small set of reported incidents across Bangladesh, Kenya, the UK, and the US highlighted how image manipulation now shows up in very different kinds of harm.

Thesis: In this small set of incidents we’ve reviewed here at Realz, manipulated and AI-generated images were used in very different contexts, from harassment and non-consensual imagery to political messaging and false breaking-news claims. The common thread is not the sophistication of any one image, but the strain these cases put on verification, trust, and decision-making.

Read article →

When Synthetic Images Stop Being "Just Content"

In this sample of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, the cases are few, recent, and drawn from just two countries: Australia and the United States. That matters. This is not a full survey of everything happening in visual manipulation, deepfakes, or AI-generated imagery.

Thesis: In this small set of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, synthetic and manipulated images were not simply a novelty or a culture-war distraction. They appeared in two very different roles: as a tool for direct personal abuse through non-consensual imagery, and as a provocative form of visual impersonation that can inflame public reaction and complicate trust. The common thread is not the image alone, but the verification burden and the social or institutional response the image is meant to trigger.

Read article →

When Manipulated Images Become a Trust Problem

In the incidents we've looked at here at Realz, one point stands out quickly: image manipulation is not only a content issue. It is a trust issue.

Thesis: In this small set of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, the clearest lesson is not that every altered image is technically novel, but that manipulated and AI-generated visuals can quickly blur the line between symbolic messaging, misinformation, and broader trust erosion. Even when the immediate harm is unclear, the verification burden rises for platforms, journalists, institutions, and the public.

Read article →

When Images Stop Being Evidence: What a Small Set of Recent Deepfake and Manipulated Photo Incidents Tells Us

In this sample of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, the cases come from only a handful of countries — Belgium, Germany, Lebanon, and Sweden — over a short period from early February to early April 2026. That is far too small and uneven a set to support sweeping conclusions about the whole information environment.

Thesis: In this small set of incidents we've reviewed here at Realz, image-related deception appears in several different forms — non-consensual synthetic imagery, celebrity and public-figure impersonation, and manipulated photos used to shape public narratives. The common thread is not just false visuals, but a growing burden of verification for institutions, platforms, and the public.

Read article →
Reading guide

Use the blog for interpretation, recurring patterns, and practical implications beyond the incident record.

These posts build on documented incidents and broader developments in how people, platforms, and institutions assess what is real.

What the blog covers

The blog focuses on broader themes behind visual-authenticity incidents, including verification, visual deception, identity abuse, trust signals, and platform responsibility.

Why it exists

Incidents show what happened. Blog posts help explain why these events matter, what patterns they reveal, and how trust online is changing.

How to read it

Start with documented incidents, then use the blog for deeper interpretation, context, and longer-form thinking around digital authenticity.